<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucas: Expanded Cinema Residency March 12th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teachingandlearningcinema.org/2007/03/12/lucas-expanded-cinema-residency-march-12th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teachingandlearningcinema.org/2007/03/12/lucas-expanded-cinema-residency-march-12th/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:21:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.teachingandlearningcinema.org/2007/03/12/lucas-expanded-cinema-residency-march-12th/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teachingandlearningcinema.org/?p=11#comment-2</guid>
		<description>William Raban got in touch to help us out!
The following is from an email he sent me:
&lt;em&gt;
&quot;I&#039;ll try answering some of the above.

Yes sometimes you are quite right that the work was nomadic though it probably worked best when performed in same space over successive days because the scale and proportion of the filmed space were consistent.

The sound got really interesting after 3 or so stages in the re-recording.  The way I did it, I think the ideal number of &quot;iterations&quot; was about 7.  Once in Bristol I had a rowdy audience though on refilming the young man who shouted &quot;who is paying for this shit&quot; becomes curiously staid (incorporated into the performance).  The more times I performed the piece (more screens within screens) the shorter became the 2&#039; 45&quot; duration because I had to move quite smartly to get 7 different performances into a single performance.

best wishes

William&quot;
&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Raban got in touch to help us out!<br />
The following is from an email he sent me:<br />
<em><br />
&#8220;I&#8217;ll try answering some of the above.</p>
<p>Yes sometimes you are quite right that the work was nomadic though it probably worked best when performed in same space over successive days because the scale and proportion of the filmed space were consistent.</p>
<p>The sound got really interesting after 3 or so stages in the re-recording.  The way I did it, I think the ideal number of &#8220;iterations&#8221; was about 7.  Once in Bristol I had a rowdy audience though on refilming the young man who shouted &#8220;who is paying for this shit&#8221; becomes curiously staid (incorporated into the performance).  The more times I performed the piece (more screens within screens) the shorter became the 2&#8242; 45&#8243; duration because I had to move quite smartly to get 7 different performances into a single performance.</p>
<p>best wishes</p>
<p>William&#8221;<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
